Variable interest entity analysis

Once a primary beneficiary is identified, it is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in the VIE and must consolidate the VIE onto its financial statements, whether or not it holds a majority voting interest. The traditional criterion for a controlling financial interest under ARB 51 is a majority voting interest.

Rather, the reporting entity could be a capital provider by being a debt holder or a guarantor. Users of private company financial statements have indicated that consolidation is not relevant to them in such situations because they focus on cash flows and tangible net worth of the stand-alone private company lessee rather than on the consolidated cash flows and tangible net worth as presented under U.

Further disclosure guidance requires a private company to consider exposures through implicit guarantees. It would also be prudent to evaluate how the expected results will impact existing loan covenants.

The assessment of a controlling financial interest under the VIE model is more complex. The existence of an implicit guarantee is a matter of facts and circumstances, which include but are not limited to: Under FIN 46, the first step is to determine if a company has a variable interest in another entity.

Consolidation and equity method

The Accounting Alternative under ASU ASU was issued to provide private companies relief from the costs and complexities of applying the VIE model to common control leasing arrangements.

Once a variable interest is established, the second step is to determine who is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity or "VIE".

Immediate family members i. Users should also be informed of the expected impact the accounting alternative will have. Qualifying criteria and practical considerations are discussed, and illustrations are presented to 1 assist preparers and management of private companies in deciding whether to adopt this accounting alternative and 2 educate other stake-holders as to the consequences.

The first three criteria must be periodically reassessed to ensure that they continue to be satisfied. The private company lessee i. FASB and the Private Company Council have concluded that this alternative, if elected, can reduce the cost and complexity of applying the VIE guidance for lessor entities under common control without the loss of decision-useful information.

Though subject to judgment and based on the facts and circumstances, the following are examples of activities that qualify as leasing activities or supporting leasing activities: The private company lessee should also disclose any information about the lessor legal entity that is required by other guidance.

Such actions have happened in similar situations in the past. The property company may issue third-party debt to acquire the facility, with a guarantee provided by the operating company or common owner. The equity investors in the VIE, as a group, lack any one of the following three characteristics: Entities might be owned in varying combinations among living siblings and their children, requiring careful consideration regarding the substance of the ownership and voting relationships.

The private company lessee has a lease arrangement with the lessor legal entity. An entity is deemed to have a controlling financial interest in a VIE when both of the following are present: Second, the implementation guidance provides several examples suggesting activities where the private company may or may not be eligible to elect the accounting alternative treatment, as illustrated in the Exhibit.

In practice, owners of private companies frequently establish a lessor entity as a VIE for tax, estate planning, or liability reasons rather than for the purpose of structuring off—balance-sheet arrangements. The amount and key terms of liabilities of the lessor legal entity that expose the private company lessee to providing financial support to the lessor should be disclosed.

The private company lessee acting as a guarantor or making funds available would be considered a conflict of interest or illegal. This requirement applies only when there are guarantees or collateral provided by the private company lessee.

Consolidation and equity method of accounting

Variable interest entity analysis The guidance cautions, however, that certain activities are not related to the leasing activity between the private company lessee and the lessor legal entity.

Moreover, financial statement users will be provided with information related to the lessor entities through the extensive disclosures required by ASU FASB then recognized that the principles of FIN 46 should apply to all entities where a variable interest exists, so the final interpretation was broader than the original objective.

If any of the criteria subsequently cease to be met, ASC C requires the private company to apply the VIE guidance on a prospective basis, as of the date the arrangement no longer qualifies for the accounting alternative. Practical Considerations Consistent with other accounting alternatives available to private companies, management should consider whether it expects to engage in an initial public offering or may be acquired by a public business entity before electing the alternative treatment.

A majority of comment letters from constituents received in response to the exposure draft that became ASU requested that a definition of common control be included in the final standard because no such definition presently exists in the ASC. The right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity.

Also, in a securitization, if a party selling assets to a VIE maintains an ongoing involvement with those assets for example as a swap counterparty to the VIE with respect to asset cashflows then Financial Accounting Standard FASwhich deals with de-recognition of assets upon transfer to a special purpose entity, will also be relevant.

These users also contend that consolidated financial statements distort the financial position of both the lessor entity and the lessee entity because the assets held by the lessor or lessee entity would be beyond the reach of its creditors, even in the case of bankruptcy.

The traditional ARB 51 approach assumed that equity - usually common stock - would receive the residual economic interest generated by a business, which is why ARB 51 focuses on equity-based majority voting interests.

Under the VIE model, the reporting entity with the controlling financial interest does not necessarily need to be an equity investor.The focus is on the variable interest entity model with an overview of the analysis process as well as more detailed comments on the scope exceptions and characteristics of a VIE.

Materiality and the VIE Consolidation Model. Posted July 24, by flysnob & filed under Variable Interest Entity. FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—An Interpretation of ARB No.

51, was issued in December in response to accounting scandals in which certain types of variable interest entities (VIE) were used to structure transactions that excluded assets and liabilities from audited consolidated financial statements. Variable interest entities (VIEs) Voting interest entities (VOEs) Equity method investments; Joint ventures (JVs) Intercompany transactions; Download our new accounting and financial reporting guide for Consolidation and equity.

when an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE); the determination of whether the decision maker’s fee arrangement is a variable interest; and how to evaluate economics and related parties when determining who consolidates a variable interest entity.

A variable interest entity (VIE) refers to a legal business structure in which an investor has a controlling interest in, despite not having a majority of voting rights; or a structure involving equity investors that do not have sufficient resources to support the ongoing operating needs of the business.

Variable Interest Entity - VIE

No. February entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities 3. Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships 4.

Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting.

Variable interest entity analysis
Rated 4/5 based on 52 review